Friday, April 30, 2010


A Review of Housing the Sacred


Having read several books on preaching this semester, I was sure I would find nothing new or exciting in Glen Wiberg's Housing the Sacred. Coming into this book with low expectations I was delighted to find that Wiberg speaks my language. As a former English major with a love of poetry and metaphor it was a joy to read this book as page after page was full of language that presented familiar themes in a new and vibrant way.

In Housing the Sacred, Glen Wiberg, the pastor emeritus of Salem Covenant Church

has written a book on preaching filled with the wisdom that comes after decades of soaking in the Word of God and proclaiming that Word to the church. This book overflows with sound advice from a seasoned pastor passing on his own experiences to benefit another generation. Wiberg writes as a pastor who is still on the journey of discovering what preaching is all about. As the subtitle to the book hints at, this book is about what he has learned and is still "learning about preaching." In this book he offers his own story not as a template or a blueprint but as a way to assist pastors in "finding one's own way from preparing the house to delivering the good news" (Wiberg 96).

Housing the Sacred is built around an architectural metaphor that draws upon the prophet Ezekiel's vision of the temple to explain the elements involved in preaching. Wiberg's thesis is that the goal in preaching is to find a way to "house the sacred" and use one's "art, skill, and poetic imagination so as to reveal the presence of God" (4). To that end each chapter of the book begins with Wiberg unpacking an architectural metaphor related to sermon-making (like how the preacher should "prepare the house"), followed by a sermon that demonstrates what this might look like in practice.

Each chapter of the book like a gourmet meal provided much to chew on and savor, but the second chapter of the book on "Preparing the House" was one that really breathed new life into sermon preparation. Wiberg lays out four ways to engage the text: 1) Imagination - a pastor needs to read in a such a way that it feels like like the first time he/she has read the text, 2) Senses - Building off of imagination, all one of one's senses need to be engaged in bringing the text to life for the listeners, 3) Emotion - by bringing out the emotions found in the text, one gets beyond the scholarly aspects of the text to the deeper parts that resonate with our humanity, 4) Design - the sermon should take listeners on a trip, rather than simply list three points (20-24). Reading this chapter, the quote that hangs with me the most is the Frederick Buechner quote in Wiberg's discussion of the senses. He says to "listen to your life" (21). What congregations need more than anything is not a scholarly pastor who engages the text at an intellectual level alone, but a poetic pastor who delves into the text like one mining for gold who shouts "Eureka!" on Sunday mornings as they relay this new discovery to the flock.

My only critique of Wiberg's book comes in his chapter on "Delivering the News." This chapter features a discussion on turning the sanctuary into a lecture hall. Wiberg's concern is that some churches in projecting the outline of a sermon or the main points onto a screen are robbing the sermon of its ability to keep listeners in suspense or surprise. The problem he sees in this approach is that listeners cannot join the preacher on a journey if they already know where the journey ends. I understand Wiberg's concerns, but I wonder if a teaching approach to preaching is really a bad thing as we live in what Wiberg calls a "bilically illiterate culture" (90). For those who have not really engaged the Bible, I feel that it might be appropriate at times to use a teaching approach to preaching as a way of demonstrating how one can engage the scriptures and apply it to one's own life.

After reading this book I hope to take the lessons about preaching as a communal act into every congregation I serve. In the first chapter of Housing the Sacred, Wiberg tells a story about a prayer meeting before a morning service with some elders at the first church he served. Before going up to start the service, one of the elders pointed Wiberg to Acts 2:14 where it says, "But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice" (5). The elderly gentleman's point was that the preacher is never alone. The whole community is involved in the act of preaching as the preacher gives voice to the faith of the community.

So how does one involve the congregation in the act of preaching? Wiberg offers helpful advice in his chapter on the "Front Porch" where he talks about listening to other voices in preparation for preaching. This could be done in a formal way, either in a meeting with deacons or a weekly Bible study meeting where the biblical text is opened and the preacher listens to the voices of the people as they encounter the Word. This can also be done informally, by simply taking this text out into the world as the preacher visits with his congregation.

Overall, reading this book fed my soul and gave me a lot to think about in terms of my own preaching. At just around one hundred pages, it was a quick, but rewarding read and I think that quick and rewarding nature might be what has me returning to this book time and again when I need inspiration and a reminder of why I preach. I preach as Wiberg says because in the sermon "Jesus is trying to speak once again in his own community" (91). So I hope in my ministry to engage the text in such a way that while my voice may be the one hitting peoples' ear drum, Jesus' voice might be the voice speaking to their hearts.


Friday, August 07, 2009

Back in the Saddle Again

The world of blogging, how I've missed you! I have had many starts and stops on this site over the years, but as I'm starting a new era of my life I figured it would be proper to give it another go and share my new experiences.
I will be on vacation till August 15, but when I return I hope to make blogging a daily adventure, so check back then to see what's new at LikeFadingWords!

Sunday, May 25, 2008

resolution

It is my endeavor to read what is good and profitable and to read with purpose. Reading aimlessly and absorbing information without digestion seems to carry with it the same problems as overeating. In that food is swallowed often without being broken down and the palate fails to make distinctions in flavor. Reading whatever is put in front of me has the same effect. So I want to read broadly and with discernment.

Monday, April 28, 2008

haiku

Guitar Dave, a street musician and friend wrote this haiku on a napkin and gave it to me.

*Haiku*

Impermanence is;
Haiku scrawled on a napkin,
That once was a tree.

-- "Vogue Rogue"


Monday, March 17, 2008

Thoughts on the Resurrection

Easter is next week. It seems like this time of year the History Channel and various other outlets make some announcement meant to diminish the Christian aspect of this holiday. Take for example last year when the "Tomb of Jesus" special appeared which was supposed to be proof that Jesus did not leave behind an empty tomb, but rather that he died and was buried and stayed that way like everyone else. These shows don't bug me, I expect them every year and there are always flaws in their arguments. What bothers me, is when the scholars on these shows make claims that Jesus didn't die and that they are still Christians in spite of that fact. What?! I'm not a philosopher but the logic behind those claims is what loses me. If Jesus didn't die then how did a new religion rise up based on his death with 30 years of his death? If Jesus didn't die then why do we have documented evidence of people that were willing to die for a belief in his death and resurrection? Couldn't somebody have told those people that the guy they were dying for was living in Jerusalem and having kids with Mary Magdalene? Obviously this is not hard, scientific evidence. I'm just saying from a logical point of view a religion should not have come about based on his death and resurrection. I don't see any reason that his followers would have made that up. There is no reason to assume that someone's death and resurrection somehow brought about the forgiveness of your sins, unless this actually happened and the resurrected Jesus appeared to them and explained it.

Paul, one of these first century Christians wrote,

"Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. 16For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied."
-- 1 Corinthians 15: 12 - 19

I think he realized how foolish it would have been to worship someone who had not died and rose again.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

it's the end of the world as we know it....

I've been having interesting conversations with friends lately about the end of the world. I'll admit right now that I'm a big History Channel fan, though I think a lot of their facts are skewed. Over the last week they have been showing a plethora of specials about the Apocalypse, the end of the world and various doomsday theories. One such show parallels the prophecies of Nostradamus, the Mayan priests, and others and their belief about something catastrophic that will occur on December 21, 2012. I have my doubts that there is anything significant about that date other than it will be the Winter Solstice for that year.
I guess I bring this up because I feel like for the first time in my life I'm beginning to think about my own mortality. In a lot of ways I feel a sense of fear and apprehension about the future. This is probably common, and I might return to this subject in a later post. For the moment I'm just curious what your thought are concerning the end of the world. What do you believe about it? What are your feelings regarding it?

Tuesday, January 29, 2008


It's the 50th anniversary of Legos.

HT: brickshelf.com